Labour is not trying to ignore Brexit at its annual conference, shadow chancellor John McDonnell has insisted.
He told the BBC the leadership had “no control” over issues chosen by members to be voted on, which include housing, rail, the NHS and pay but not Europe.
But he said there would still be an “extensive” discussion on the subject as Labour tried to “build a consensus”.
The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg said pro-EU MPs were accusing the leadership of shirking a “full and bumpy” debate.
- Conference Live: Video and text updates
- Kuenssberg: Brexit differences won’t ruin the party
- Corbyn pushes back on single market
- Labour promises women’s retirement reform
Labour members are discussing Brexit and international issues at the moment – with a succession of strongly argued speeches for and against the party’s position on Brexit.
But the focus is on approving Labour’s existing policy and there will be no vote on contentious issues such as the future of single market membership.
Brexit was not chosen by local members and trade union members as one of the eight motions to be voted on in Brighton.
The Jeremy Corbyn-supporting Momentum group had urged its members not to support a resolution on Brexit, emailing them with an alternative list of subjects to choose – including the Grenfell Tower tragedy, rail, growth and investment, workers’ rights and social care.
Mr McDonnell said the choice of resolutions was up to party members but there would still be a “robust and thorough” debate on a Brexit statement from Labour’s National Executive Committee and the terms of exit remained a “key issue” for the party.
“The delegates choose their priorities and that is what they have done,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today. “The leadership does not control that at all… the whole point of our party now is to hand our party back to the membership.”
He claimed that Labour, which backs remaining in the single market during a post-Brexit transitional phase but then wants to secure tariff-free access to EU markets afterwards, was the “only party” capable of uniting the country after the UK’s exit.
People were telling him that Labour had “to understand all the ramifications of the different options and then build consensus both in our the party but also the community itself”.
He said a “consensus was emerging” that continued membership of the single market membership was not viable – given the obligations it placed on the UK to accept freedom of movement – but that a compromise might be possible to give UK firms equivalent access.
“Is there a way that reforms can take place that will enable us to have access to the single market? In that way, we can achieve a compromise within the community which gains us the benefits of the EU as it were and overcome some of the perceived disbenefits”.
Several Labour MPs tweeted their displeasure at suggestions Brexit was being downplayed.
Former shadow chancellor Chris Leslie said the outcome was “utterly ridiculous” and former culture secretary Ben Bradshaw tweeted: “Keeping #Brexit, biggest issue of our time, off our #lab17 agenda is silly and undermines the claim that we are listening to our members.”
Although Labour’s ruling NEC will finalise an agreed statement on Brexit that delegates will be allowed to vote on in an attempt to defuse tensions, it will not commit the party to single market membership beyond the transition period.
The BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg said that while minimising the opportunities for conflict might be seen as “politically clever”, given the divisions in the party over Brexit, she said many MPs would find the situation “frustratingly vague”.
A number of Labour members criticised the party’s backing for Brexit during Monday’s debate.
Cameron Clack, from Stamford and Grantham, said Labour had “voted away” its chance to keep the UK in the single market and customs union, telling activists “will be remembered as the opposition that let the Tories to do what they want with Brexit”.
“We’re supposed to be a party of outward-looking, internationalist, democratic socialists.”
But shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said, that unlike the Conservatives, Labour’s front bench were “all pulling in the same direction” and their focus in the Brexit negotiations was on “three priorities… jobs, jobs and jobs”.